What is video encoding?
Video encoding is the process of converting digital video files from one format to another. Encoding is also known as “transcoding” or “video conversion.” At the time of recording, the device gives the video file a particular format and other specifications. If the video owner wants to publish the video, s/he must consider the various devices on which the video might play. All of the videos we watch on our computers, tablets, and mobile phones have gone through an encoding process that converts the original source video so that it is viewable on various output formats. This is because many device and browser types only support specific video formats. Often, the goal of the video publisher is to ensure compatibility with a variety of common formats.
Digital video may exist in many different formats-each with specific variables such as containers (.MOV, .FLV, .MP4, .OGG, .WMV, WebM), codecs (H264, VP6) and bitrates (in megabits or kilobits per second). Different devices and browsers have varying specifications, most of which involve one or more of these variables—and other variables. When you encode video, you need to consider (a) the original source format and capture method, (b) any later encoding operations that may have been done on the video source, and (c) the output formats that you require. With Encoding.com, you get full control across many of these variables to help you efficiently convert your source videos from one format to one or more output formats.
A video coding format(or sometimes video compression format) is a content representation format for storage or transmission of digital video content (such as in a data file or bitstream). Examples of video coding formats include MPEG-2 Part 2, MPEG-4 Part 2, H.264 (MPEG-4 Part 10), HEVC, Theora, RealVideo RV40, VP9, and AV1. A specific software or hardware implementation capable of video compression and/or decompression to/from a specific video coding format is called a video codec; an example of a video codec is Xvid, which is one of several different codecs which implements encoding and decoding videos in the MPEG-4 Part 2 video coding format in software.
SKD121X Encoding & Multiplexing Modulator
Household Universal Encoding & Modulation Modulator
HDMI Encoder Modulator,16in1 Digital Headend,HD RF Modulator at Soukacatv.com
Some video coding formats are documented by a detailed technical specification document known as a video coding specification. Some such specifications are written and approved by standardization organizations as technical standards, and are thus known as a video coding standard. The term 'standard' is also sometimes used for de facto standards as well as formal standards.
Video content encoded using a particular video coding format is normally bundled with an audio stream (encoded using an audio coding format) inside a multimedia container format such as AVI, MP4, FLV, RealMedia, or Matroska. As such, the user normally doesn't have a H.264 file, but instead has a .mp4 video file, which is an MP4 container containing H.264-encoded video, normally alongside AAC-encoded audio. Multimedia container formats can contain any one of a number of different video coding formats; for example the MP4 container format can contain video in either the MPEG-2 Part 2 or the H.264 video coding format, among others. Another example is the initial specification for the file type WebM, which specified the container format (Matroska), but also exactly which video (VP8) and audio (Vorbis) compression format is used inside the Matroska container, even though the Matroska container format itself is capable of containing other video coding formats (VP9 video and Opus audio support was later added to the WebM specification).
Distinction between "format" and "codec"
Although video coding formats such as H.264 are sometimes referred to as codecs, there is a clear conceptual difference between a specification and its implementations. Video coding formats are described in specifications, and software or hardware to encode/decode data in a given video coding format from/to uncompressed video are implementations of those specifications. As an analogy, the video coding format H.264 (specification) is to the codec OpenH264 (specific implementation) what the C Programming Language (specification) is to the compiler GCC (specific implementation). Note that for each specification (e.g. H.264), there can be many codecs implementing that specification (e.g. x264, OpenH264, H.264/MPEG-4 AVC products and implementations).
This distinction is not consistently reflected terminologically in the literature. The H.264 specification calls H.261, H.262, H.263, and H.264 video coding standards and does not contain the word codec.The Alliance for Open Media clearly distinguishes between the AV1 video coding format and the accompanying codec they are developing, but calls the video coding format itself a video codec specification.The VP9 specification calls the video coding format VP9 itself a codec.
As an example of conflation, Chromium's and Mozilla's pages listing their video format support both call video coding formats such as H.264 codecs. As another example, in Cisco's announcement of a free-as-in-beer video codec, the press release refers to the H.264 video coding format as a "codec" ("choice of a common video codec"), but calls Cisco's implementation of a H.264 encoder/decoder a "codec" shortly thereafter ("open-source our H.264 codec").
A video coding format does not dictate all algorithms used by a codec implementing the format. For example, a large part of how video compression typically works is by finding similarities between video frames (block-matching), and then achieving compression by copying previously-coded similar subimages (e.g., macroblocks) and adding small differences when necessary. Finding optimal combinations of such predictors and differences is an NP-hard problem,meaning that it is practically impossible to find an optimal solution. While the video coding format must support such compression across frames in the bitstream format, by not needlessly mandating specific algorithms for finding such block-matches and other encoding steps, the codecs implementing the video coding specification have some freedom to optimize and innovate in their choice of algorithms. For example, section 0.5 of the H.264 specification says that encoding algorithms are not part of the specification.Free choice of algorithm also allows different space–time complexity trade-offs for the same video coding format, so a live feed can use a fast but space-inefficient algorithm, while a one-time DVD encoding for later mass production can trade long encoding-time for space-efficient encoding.
History
The first digital video coding standard was H.120, created by ITU in 1984.H.120 was not usable in practice, as its performance was too poor. Its 1988 successor, ITU's H.261, was the first practical video coding standard.MPEG-1, designed by the Motion Picture Experts Group, followed in 1991, and MPEG-2/H.262 in 1994.
Perhaps the most widely used video coding format as of 2016 is H.264. H.264 is one of the video encoding standards for Blu-ray Discs; all Blu-ray Disc players must be able to decode H.264. It is also widely used by streaming internet sources, such as videos from YouTube, Netflix, Vimeo, and the iTunes Store, web software such as the Adobe Flash Player and Microsoft Silverlight, and also various HDTV broadcasts over terrestrial (Advanced Television Systems Committee standards, ISDB-T, DVB-T or DVB-T2), cable (DVB-C), and satellite (DVB-S2).
A main problem for many video coding formats has been patents, making it expensive to use and/or potentially risking a patent lawsuit due to submarine patents. The motivation behind many recently designed video coding formats such as Theora, VP8, and VP9 have been to create a (libre) video coding standard covered only by royalty-free patents.Patent status has also been a major point of contention for the choice of which video formats the mainstream web browsers will support inside the HTML5 video tag.
In the near future, the main contenders for the next generation video coding format looks to be the heavily patented HEVC (H.265) and the aiming-to-be-freely-licensed AV1.
Timeline of international video compression standards
| |||
Year
|
Standard
|
Publisher
|
Popular implementations
|
1984
|
H.120
|
ITU-T
| |
1988
|
H.261
|
ITU-T
|
Videoconferencing, videotelephony
|
1993
|
MPEG-1 Part 2
|
ISO, IEC
|
Video-CD
|
1995
|
H.262/MPEG-2 Part 2
|
ISO, IEC, ITU-T
|
DVD Video, Blu-ray, DVB, ATSC, SVCD
|
1996
|
H.263
|
ITU-T
|
Videoconferencing, videotelephony, video on mobile phones (3GP)
|
1999
|
MPEG-4 Part 2
|
ISO, IEC
|
Video on Internet (DivX, Xvid ...)
|
2003
|
H.264/MPEG-4 AVC
|
ISO, IEC, ITU-T
|
Blu-ray, HD DVD, DVB, ATSC, iPod Video, Apple TV, videoconferencing
|
2006
|
VC-1
|
SMPTE
|
Blu-ray, video on Internet
|
2013
|
H.265/MPEG-H HEVC
|
ISO, IEC, ITU-T
|
Ultra HD Blu-ray, DVB, ATSC 3.0, UHD streaming, High Efficiency Image Format, macOS High Sierra, iOS 11|-
|
2018
|
AV1
|
Alliance for Open Media
|
HTML5 video
|
Lossless, lossy, and uncompressed video coding formats
Consumer video is generally compressed using lossy video codecs, since that results in significantly smaller files than lossless compression. While there are video coding formats designed explicitly for either lossy or lossless compression, some video coding formats such as Dirac and H.264 support both.
Uncompressed video formats, such as Clean HDMI, is a form of lossless video used in some circumstances such as when sending video to a display over a HDMI connection. Some high-end cameras can also capture video directly in this format.
Intra-frame video coding formats
Interframe compression complicates editing of an encoded video sequence.One subclass of relatively simple video coding formats are the intra-frame video formats, such as DV, in which each frame of the video stream is compressed independently without referring to other frames in the stream, and no attempt is made to take advantage of correlations between successive pictures over time for better compression. One example is Motion JPEG, which is simply a sequence of individually JPEG-compressed images. This approach is quick and simple, at the expense the encoded video being much larger than a video coding format supporting Inter frame coding.
Because interframe compression copies data from one frame to another, if the original frame is simply cut out (or lost in transmission), the following frames cannot be reconstructed properly. Making 'cuts' in intraframe-compressed video while video editing is almost as easy as editing uncompressed video: one finds the beginning and ending of each frame, and simply copies bit-for-bit each frame that one wants to keep, and discards the frames one doesn't want. Another difference between intraframe and interframe compression is that, with intraframe systems, each frame uses a similar amount of data. In most interframe systems, certain frames (such as "I frames" in MPEG-2) aren't allowed to copy data from other frames, so they require much more data than other frames nearby.
It is possible to build a computer-based video editor that spots problems caused when I frames are edited out while other frames need them. This has allowed newer formats like HDV to be used for editing. However, this process demands a lot more computing power than editing intraframe compressed video with the same picture quality.
Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com main products are modulators both in analog and digital ones, amplifier and combiner. We are the very first one in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world.
For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com.
CONTACT US
Company:Dingshengwei Electronics Co., Ltd
Address : BldgA,the first industry park of Guanlong,Xili Town,Nanshan,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China
Tel : +86 0755 26909863
Fax : +86 0755 26984949
Mobile : 13410066011
Email : ken@soukacatv.com
Source: Wikipedia
