2019年6月10日星期一

Need For Modulation in Digital or Analog Communications System | Soukacatv.com



Modulation is a signal-processing operation that is basic to the transmission of an information-bearing signal over a communication channel, whether in the context of digital or analog communications. This operation is accomplished by changing some parameter of a carrier wave in accordance with the information-bearing (message) signal. The carrier wave may take one of two basic forms, depending on the application of interest:

HDMI Encoder Modulator, 16in1 Digital Headend, HD RF Modulator at Soukacatv.com


Sinusoidal carrier wave, whose amplitude, phases, or frequency is the parameter chosen for modification by the information-bearing signal.

Periodic sequence of pulses, whose amplitude, width, or position is the parameter chosen for modification by the information-bearing signal. The IEEE defines modulation as

“a process whereby certain characteristics of a wave, often called the carrier, are varied or selected in accordance with a modulating function.”

The modulating function is the information baseband.

Reasons why modulation is necessary in communications system:- 

We can see that baseband signals are in compatible for direct transmission over the medium so; we have to use modulation To convey (baseband) signals from one place to another.

Allows frequency translation
 (I.e. translate the signal from one region in the frequency domain to another) The benefits of frequency translation are:
Frequency Multiplexing

Reduce the height of antenna

Avoids mixing of signals

Narrow banding (convert wideband signal into narrowband signals)

Common processing

We can make efficient transmission
Quite a few wireless channels have their own appropriate pass bands. For efficient transmission, it would be necessary to shift the message spectrum into the pass band of the channel intended. Ground wave propagation (from the lower atmosphere) is possible only up to about 2 MHz Long distance ionosphere propagation is possible for frequencies in the range 2 to 30 MHz beyond 30 MHz, the propagation is line of sight. Preferred frequencies for satellite communication are around 3 to 6 GHz. By choosing an appropriate carrier frequency and modulation technique, it is possible for us to translate the baseband message spectrum into a suitable slot in the pass band of the channel intended. That is, modulation results in frequency translation.

Uses for ease of radiation
Consider again transmission of good quality audio. Assume we choose the carrier frequency to be 1MHz. The linear modulation schemes that would be discussed shortly give rise to a maximum frequency spread (of the modulated signal) of 40 kHz, the spectrum of the modulated signal extending from(1000 - 20) = 980 kHz to (1000 + 20) = 1020 kHz. If the antenna is designed for 1000 kHz, it can easily take care of the entire range of frequencies involved because modulation process has rendered the signal into a NBBP signal.
Allows frequency assignment
You can tune radio or TV stations by using filtering because each station has owned assigned carrier frequency

Allows multiplexing of signals
Multiplexing Is a method of sharing a bandwidth with other independent data Channels. So, we can combine several signals for simultaneous transmission on one channel .Ex. FDM uses CW modulation TDM uses pulse modulation CDM, WDM and so on.

Allows multiple access of signals
Multiple accesses is a variation of multiplexing which involves a fixed assignment of the common communications resource at local level, it also involves the remote sharing of the resource. Ex. FDMATDMACDMA and so on.

Allows adjustments in the bandwidth
You can make a smaller or larger bandwidth than the original signal to control the SNR in the receiver

Reduced noise and interference
The signals communication using modulation techniques reduce the effect of noise and interference to great extent so the quality of reception improve

Overcomes hardware limitation
Communication system design may by constrained by the cost and availability of hardware

For example hardware that depend on frequency you can put the signals in some frequency that avoids hardware limitation

Increases the range of communication
At low frequencies radiation is poor and signal gets highly attenuated. Baseband signals have significant spectral content around DC. Some of the baseband signals that are of interest to us are: a) Speech b) music and c) video (TV signals).Approximate spectral widths of these signals are: Speech: 5 kHz, Audio: 20 kHz, Video: 5 MHz Therefore baseband signals cannot be transmitted directly over long distance. Modulation effectively increases the frequency of the signal to be radiated and so increase the distance of communication
Increases the speed of communication
You can speed the communication by using aproper method of modulation and multiplexing.

Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com main products are modulators both in analog and digital ones, amplifier and combiner. We are the very first one in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world.
For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com.

CONTACT US
Dingshengwei Electronics Co., Ltd
Company Address: Building A, the first industry park of Guanlong, Xili Town, Nanshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Tel: +86 0755 26909863
Fax: +86 0755 26984949
Phone: +86 13410066011
Email:ken@soukacatv.com
Skype: soukaken

Source: zh.scribd




What’s the Difference Between MPEG1 and MPEG2? | Soukacatv.com


MPEG1 vs MPEG2
MPEG1 and MPEG2 are both standards for the generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information. These standards describe the combined lossy compression of audio and video procedure which allows the storage and transmission of moving pictures with audio.
HDMI Encoder Modulator, 16in1 Digital Headend, HD RF Modulator at Soukacatv.com

The compression standard for VHS quality digital video with a CD audio down to 1.5 Megabits per second is MPEG-1. In MPEG-1, the compression ratio of video without losing too much quality is 26:1 and the ratio or audio is 6:1. This type of compression makes it viable for digital audio and TV broadcasting as well as the creation of video CDs. As a consequence, this lossy audio and video format has become hugely popular due to its wide compatibility. Various products and applications use the MPEG-1 standard especially the audio format it introduced, the extremely popular MP3.
Then again, the older MPEG1 has some weaknesses that were addressed by its successor, the MPEG2. These said weaknesses are:
-The audio compression is limited to two channels.
– There is no standardized support for interlaced video with poor compression when used for interlaced video
– It has a limited standardized profile — Constrained Parameters Bitstream — which was incompatible for video with higher resolutions. MPEG1 might support 4k video but there was no practical way to encode video for higher resolutions. Identification of hardware capable of support is also limited.
– It supports only one color space — 4:2:0.

MPEG2 can be considered as an enhanced MPEG1 in terms of quality as it is used for DVD productions. MPEG2 can capture audio/video in higher resolutions and use higher bitrates, however, one won’t see much difference if the source is from a VHS type of movie quality. If one is concerned with high quality output, then, MPEG2 standard is likely to be the choice.
Officially, the MPEG2 standard adds a number of features over the older MPEG1, including Variable quantization and VBR. It is quite obvious that MPEG2 has a more complex algorithm in its encoding. MPEG2 can’t be played with MPEG1 players since MPEG2 streams are incompatible with those of MPEG1.
Basically, one may consider MPEG2 as an MPEG1 that supports higher resolutions and capable of using higher and variable bitrates. However, one can argue that MPEG1 performs better in lower bitrates than MPEG2.

Summary:
1. MPEG2 succeeded the MPEG1 to address some of the older standard’s weaknesses.
2. MPEG2 has better quality than MPEG1.
3. MPEG1 is used for VCD while MPEG2 is used for DVD.
4. One may consider MPEG2 as MPEG1 that supports higher resolutions and capable of using higher and variable bitrates.
5. MPEG1 is older than MPEG2 but the former is arguably better in lower bitrates.
6. MPEG2 has a more complex encoding algorithm.

Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com main products are modulators both in analog and digital ones, amplifier and combiner. We are the very first one in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world.
For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com.

CONTACT US
Dingshengwei Electronics Co., Ltd
Company Address: Building A, the first industry park of Guanlong, Xili Town, Nanshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Tel : +86 0755 26909863
Fax : +86 0755 26984949
Phone: +86 13410066011
Email:ken@soukacatv.com
Skype: soukaken

Source: difference between




H.265 benchmarked: Does the next-generation video codec live up to expectations? | Soukacatv.com

The next-generation High Efficiency Video codec (HEVC), H.265, has hit a major public milestone thanks to the work of the developer MultiCoreWare. MCW is launching a new commercial open-source venture around x265, and the source code for its x265 encoder is now available. Right now, the project is very much in early days — pre-alpha level code — but the x265 encoder is already impressively parallelized and supports all of the major instruction sets including AVX/AVX2 and FMA3/FMA4.


The benefits of H.265
H.264 has been a huge success. It’s a flexible codec standard that’s used by streaming services, satellite providers, and for Blu-ray discs. It’s scaled remarkably well since it was first proposed and is capable of handling 3D, 48-60 fps encodes, and even 4K. The Blu-ray disc standard doesn’t currently include provisions for some of these technologies, but the H.264 codec itself is capable of handling them.
The problem with H.264, however, is that while it can handle these types of encodes, it can’t do so while simultaneously keeping file sizes low. A new standard is necessary to push file/stream sizes back down while driving next-generation adoption, and that’s where H.265 comes in. It’s designed to utilize substantially less bandwidth thanks to advanced encoding techniques and a more sophisticated encode/decode model.

Unlike H.264, which can extend to cover 4K television but wasn’t designed with the feature in mind, H.265 was built to match the capabilities of future screens and includes support for 10-bit color and high frame rates. This is early days — support and capability of the current alpha are limited to 8-bit color and YUV output, but we still wanted to take the alpha technology out for a spin. Armed with a freshly compiled version and some test clips, we set out to see what we could build.
First up — file sizes. What we’re comparing here is actually the size of the elementary video stream. Note that these are video streams only — audio isn’t encoded in either instance. Encode sizes were defined by the quantizer setting, with lower q-values equaling a higher quality (and larger file size). The base encoded file is 500 frames of a 1.5GB, YUV 4:2:0 file at 50 fps. The elementary stream file size is used for comparison here because it represents what’s transmitted to the decoder to create the final output. We’re working with elementary streams because, at this stage of the project (pre-alpha), the decoded video file always comes back at 1.5GB, regardless of the stream quality used to create it.

This gives a good basic idea of what sorts of benefits H.265 can offer compared to H.264. While it’s not hitting 50% bandwidth savings in most cases, it’s close — quantizer 24 is 57% the size, q=30 is 59%, and q=40 is just 47%. Granted, at a quantizer of 40, the final output is wretched — but it’s wretched at less than half the bandwidth.

Performance & image quality
The next area we wanted to consider was performance. H.265 is known for taking more horsepower to encode and decode than H.264, though the team developing the standard continues to emphasize the role of parallel computing in speeding the encode/decode process. It’s implied that OpenCL support will materialize sooner, rather than later, which means initiatives like AMD’s HSAcould get a boost from x265 support early in 2014.
Right now, we’re limited to CPU support, but Multi-CoreWare spokesperson Tom Vaughan emphasized that the team has already been working on strong multithreading. We decided to test the alpha decoder using Sandy Bridge-E, Ivy Bridge, and Haswell. We experimented with different levels of parallelization but settled on options that stuck to the number of physical cores in a system (6, 4, and 4). Hyper-Threading was enabled, but setting for 12/8-thread parallelization actually increased encode time slightly.

The parallelization performance looks good — Sandy Bridge-E, with six cores, is somewhat ahead of Ivy Bridge with four. Similarly, Ivy Bridge is beaten out by Haswell, thanks to the new core’s AVX2 support and better performance characteristics. Compared to x264, even on the –veryslow preset, x265 encodes take noticeably longer — our Ivy Bridge 3770K encoded the same file in H.264 in 129 seconds as compared to 247 seconds for H.265. Keep in mind, however, that this is very, very early software.
Of more interest is the quality question — how does the H.265 output compare to the uncompressed original? We chose a basketball clip because, at 50 fps, it’s full of the sort of fast motion that often gives encoders fits. H.265’s smaller sizes won’t be worth much if the final output isn’t as good.
To that end, here’s the original uncompressed YUV output, the H.265 encode at q=24, and the H.264 output at q=24. Click on each image to enlarge it.
The variance here is minimal. The hardwood floor underneath the the leaping player is slightly less blurry in the H.264 variant, but the H.265 image quality is phenomenal considering it’s half the size. What about lower qualities? Here’s H.265 and H.264 at q=30; H.265 is first.



At q=30 (file sizes of 6.39MB and 10.87MB), the H.265 video stream is arguably better than the H.264 encode stream. We’re not trying to claim this is an absolute — as always, encode settings matter a great deal and are sensitive to tweaking. But after waiting more than a year for H.265 to break cover, it’s clear that the new standard is going to offer what its proponents have claimed.

Encode/decode support, meanwhile, is already going to be possible on a vast range of products. Modern CPUs are more than capable of decoding H.265 in software, OpenCLsupport is coming in future iterations, and hardware GPU support, while not formally guaranteed by AMD, Intel, or Nvidia for next-generation products, is a mid-term certainty. All three companies have previously leapt to include advanced video pipelines in their products — as the H.265 presentation notes, video is something that’s become ubiquitous across every type of device.

Long-term, H.265 will likely succeed H.264’s position as the premier solution for advanced video, though that may depend on whether or not battery consumption while decoding can match H.264’s levels in the long term. That’s something we’ll only be able to evaluate once hardware is available, but for now we’re optimistic. H.265’s explicitly parallel model should map well against multi-core devices of the future.

Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com main products are modulators both in analog and digital ones, amplifier and combiner. We are the very first one in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world.
For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com.

CONTACT US
Dingshengwei Electronics Co., Ltd
Company Address: Building A, the first industry park of Guanlong, Xili Town, Nanshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Tel : +86 0755 26909863
Fax : +86 0755 26984949
Phone: +86 13410066011
Email:ken@soukacatv.com
Skype: soukaken

Sourceextremetech





2019年6月9日星期日

HEVC/H.265 codec system and transmission experiments aimed at 8K broadcasting | Soukacatv.com


This paper introduces the world’s first video and audio codec system that complies with 8K broadcasting standards and describes transmission experiments via a broadcasting satellite using this system.
8K Super Hi-Vision (8K) is a broadcasting system capable of highly realistic 8K Ultra High Definition Television (UHDTV) video and 22.2 multichannel audio.
HDMI Encoder Modulator, 16in1 Digital Headend, HD RF Modulator at Soukacatv.com

In Japan, domestic standards for 8K broadcasting were formulated in 2014 and 8K test broadcasting began in 2016.
We have developed an 8K High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)/H.265 codec system that complies with the domestic standards.
In this paper, we first explain the features and a roadmap for 8K broadcasting.
We then introduce the features of the 8K HEVC/H.265 codec system developed.
Finally, we describe transmission experiments using a satellite system that is equivalent to the one that will be used in test broadcasting.
The results allowed us to confirm that the developed system provides high-quality transmission at the expected bit rate during test broadcasting.

INTRODUCTION

An 8K Super Hi-Vision (8K) broadcasting system capable of highly realistic 8K Ultra High Definition Television (UHDTV) video and 22.2 multichannel (22.2 ch) audio is currently under development.
In Japan, domestic standards for 8K broadcasting were formulated in 2014 and 8K test broadcasting using a broadcasting satellite will begin in 2016.
The standards prescribe video coding, audio coding, multiplexing and transmission schemes, and other such procedures.
Compression of video data to a transmittable bit rate while maintaining high quality is a key issue that must be addressed in order to realize 8K broadcasting.
A new video coding scheme, referred to as High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)/H.265 (1), was standardized in 2013.
HEVC supports 8K video formats and achieves approximately twice the compression level of the existing Advanced Video Coding (AVC)/H.264 scheme.
Its coding performance shows a particularly significant improvement relative to the previous schemes for high-resolution video such as 8K.
On the other hand, the computational cost for HEVC encoding and decoding is quite high and is reported to be more than twice that of AVC.
This makes realization of real-time HEVC processing challenging.
We have developed the world’s first 8K HEVC/H.265 real-time codec (encoder and decoder) system that complies with the domestic standards.
The system allows 22.2 ch audio coding and video/audio multiplexing, with these functions integrated into the video encoder and decoder.
The system was tested by transmission experiments using a broadcasting satellite in 2015.
In this paper, we first explain the features and a roadmap for 8K broadcasting.
We then introduce the features of the 8K HEVC/H.265 codec system.
Finally, we describe transmission experiments using a satellite system that is equivalent to the system that will be used for the test broadcasts.

8K BROADCASTING

In this section, we explain the features and a roadmap for 8K broadcasting.

8K Super Hi-Vision

8K is a TV broadcasting system designed to deliver highly realistic 8K video and 22.2 ch audio.
Table 1 shows the parameters for 8K and a current 2K digital broadcasting system using a broadcasting satellite (BS) in Japan. The 8K provides much higher fidelity than the existing broadcasting system.
Table 1
Parameters for 8K Super Hi Vision and current BS digital broadcasting in Japan
The 8K video format is internationally standardized in Recommendation (Rec.) International Telecommunication Union Radio communications Sector (ITU-R) BT. 2020 (2).
Since the number of pixels in the horizontal direction is 7,680 pixels, it is called “8K.”
Its characteristics are higher spatial resolution, higher frame rate, higher bit depth, and wider color gamut than those of the existing broadcasting video formats.
The uncompressed bit rate for the 8K/12 bit/60 Hz format is approximately 72 Gbps.
The 22.2 ch audio format is standardized in Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE) 2036-2-2008 (3).
It is characterized by a larger number of channels, increased sampling rate, and larger quantization bit.
The uncompressed bit rate for the 22.2 ch/48 kHz/24 bit format is approximately 25 Mbps.
Because of the enormous uncompressed bit rate of 8K video, compression of the video to a transmittable bit rate while maintaining high quality is a key issue for 8K broadcasting.

8K Broadcasting Roadmap

In Japan, a committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) presented a roadmap for 8K broadcasting in 2014.
According to the roadmap, 8K test broadcasting will begin in 2016 and 8K broadcasting is planned to begin by 2018.
Established in 2000, the Soukacatv.com main products are modulators both in analog and digital ones, amplifier and combiner. We are the very first one in manufacturing the headend system in China. Our 16 in 1 and 24 in 1 now are the most popular products all over the world.
For more, please access to https://www.soukacatv.com.

CONTACT US
Dingshengwei Electronics Co., Ltd
Company Address: Building A, the first industry park of Guanlong, Xili Town, Nanshan, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Tel : +86 0755 26909863
Fax : +86 0755 26984949
Phone: +86 13410066011
Email:ken@soukacatv.com
Skype: soukaken

Source ibc